| ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2023 | Volume
: 6
| Issue : 2 | Page : 154-156 |
|
|
Retrospective analysis of efficacy of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study low-risk criteria and the Canadian cervical spine rules for cervical spine trauma
KM Pawan Kumar, P Madhuchandra, G Sunil Santhosh
Department of Orthopaedics, BGS Global Institute of Medical Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Correspondence Address:
K M Pawan Kumar
Department of Orthopaedics, BGS GIMS Under RGUHS, Kengeri, Bengaluru - 560 090, Karnataka
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
DOI: 10.4103/jodp.jodp_96_22
|
|
|
Background: With increasing road traffic accidents, cervical spine injuries are a major health hazard in the developed as well as the developing world. Over the years, the National Emergency X-radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) low-risk criteria and the Canadian cervical spine rules (CCRs) have acted as primary guidelines in emergency departments around the world to decide on the need for cervical spine X-ray in emergency settings. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the efficiency of both the NEXUS low-risk criteria and CCR in confirming positive cervical spine injuries in emergency department settings. Aims and Objectives: The aim was to retrospectively analyze the efficiency of both the NEXUS low-risk criteria and CCR in confirming positive cervical spine injuries. Methods: A retrospective study involving 631 patients for 4 years aged above 18 years, who underwent a cervical spine X-ray from June 2018 to June 2022, were included in the study. From the eligible case records, the data pertaining to the NEXUS low-risk criteria and CCR were recorded. Along with this, the final diagnosis regarding the cervical spine injury, confirmed by subsequent computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), was also recorded. Results: The NEXUS low-risk criteria and CCR were met in 92.7% and 98.6% of the patients, respectively. The cervical spine X-rays were normal in 87.8% of the patients, fractures were recorded in 9.5% of the patients, and in 2.7% of the patients, doubtful lesions were present, which needed additional investigations in the form of CT scan or MRI or both. Conclusion: Both the Nexus and CCR guidelines act as a good guiding light in deciding about the need for the cervical spine X-ray in the emergency setup. Both guidelines are effective in ruling out cervical spine injuries in the majority of cases.
|
|
|
|
| [FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|
